Cancer Research UK logo.

Pre-alpha

SearchDonate
  • Search

Clinical Research Committee

This committee oversees funding and endorsement of investigator-led clinical research and studies supporting or enabling clinical trials.

Committee remit

Our Clinical Research Committee (CRC) maintains a broad portfolio to maximise patient impact, supporting research across various treatment types, disease areas and cancer stages.

We’re particularly interested in proposals addressing areas of strategic priority for us including research into cancers that affect children and young people, rare cancers or cancers of unmet need such as brain, lung, oesophageal, pancreatic, liver and stomach cancer.   

Our clinical research statement of intent provides an overview of how we implement our research strategy and guidance to researchers on what kind of research we want to fund. It also helps to guide the strategic funding decisions made by the CRC.  

Read our research strategyRead our clinical research statement of intent

Schemes reviewed by this committee

Clinical Research Funding Scheme

Our modular scheme supports high-quality, biologically rich trials and studies using innovative and adaptive designs that seek to maximise what we can learn from every participant. We encourage bold and creative applications.

How applications are assessed

The CRC and its expert review panel meet twice a year to review all applications. They assess applications based on: 

  • importance and rationale of the research questions – both clinical and scientific 

  • alignment with our research strategy and clinical research statement of intent 

  • expected impact, or potential future impact, on clinical practice and patient outcome 

  • strength of study design, including statistical design, rationale and the appropriate integration of modules 

  • adequacy of background information and supporting evidence 

  • expected interest in patients and adequacy of the recruitment plan and supporting evidence, where appropriate  

  • expertise of the study team, including meaningful involvement of early career researchers  

  • likelihood of successful delivery  

  • where possible, recruitment is representative of the target patient population

  • study is designed, and will be delivered, with diversity and inclusion in mind in order to identify and reduce barriers for underserved populations to access research

  • appropriate and meaningful patient involvement in the development, delivery, governance and dissemination of the study 

  • suitable justification of costs, including the appropriate phasing of costings in line with expected milestones 

Additional criteria for sample collection and/or data analysis

Proposals including sample collection and/or data analysis must also demonstrate:   

  • strength of the research hypotheses  

  • uniqueness of the opportunity to collect samples and/or data 

  • potential future value of the proposed samples and/or data 

  • appropriateness of techniques and procedures, including statistical aspects where applicable  

  • transparency of arrangements for sample discoverability and access for other research groups, including alignment with the FAIR principles  

Additional criteria for biomarkers

The committee will use the following additional criteria to guide their review of proposals involving biomarkers:

  • a clear scientific and clinical need for the biomarker

  • robust preliminary data to support the hypothesis

  • access to appropriate clinical samples

  • robustness of the assay

  • suitable number and quality of samples

  • link to a clinical trial (either prospectively or retrospectively)

  • ‘line of sight’ to the clinic

  • appropriately powered study to ensure results

  • detailed description of the statistical analysis plan

  • appropriate biomarker statistician / expertise named on the application

  • appropriate multi-disciplinary expertise in the proposed research team to undertake the project

The terms of reference for this committee provide guidance for how they should assess all applications. 

Read the committee's terms of reference(PDF, 691 KB)

How funding is monitored

Studies funded by this committee are monitored through the Clinical Research Monitoring Panel (CRMP). This ensures the studies are progressing as planned. The panel meets three times per year to review annual Scientific Milestone Reports and determine whether to continue support. 

Read the CRMP terms of reference (PDF, 219 KB)

Committee and panel members

Committee chair 

Professor Andrew Tutt - The Institute of Cancer Research 

Committee vice-chairs 

  • Professor Frances Balkwill - Queen Mary, University of London 

  • Dr Bristi Basu - The University of Cambridge (also chair of the Clinical Expert Review Panel) 

Committee members 

  • Dr Raza Ali – University of Cambridge  

  • Professor Gerhardt Attard - University College London 

  • Professor Sarah Brown - The University of Leeds 

  • Professor Steve Clifford – Newcastle University  

  • Professor Andy Davies - The University of Southampton 

  • Professor Awen Gallimore – Cardiff University  

  • Professor Charlie Gourley - The University of Edinburgh  

  • Professor Alastair Greystoke - Newcastle University 

  • Chris Hurt – University of Southampton 

  • Professor Mariam Jamal-Hanjani - University College London 

  • Professor Robert Jones – University of Liverpool  

  • Professor Simon Leedham - The University of Oxford 

  • Professor Paul Lorigan - The University of Manchester 

  • Professor James O'Connor - The Institute of Cancer Research/University of Manchester 

  • Dr Stefan Michiels - Gustave Roussy 

  • Dr Jessica Okosun - Queen Mary, University of London/Barts Cancer Institute 

  • Professor Roberto Salgado - TCRU GZA Antwerp  

  • Dr Gudrun Schleiermacher - Institute Curie 

Clinical Research Monitoring Panel

Panel chair

Dr Natalie Cook - University of Manchester 

Panel vice-chairs

  • Sarah Pearson - University of Oxford 

  • Dr John Moppett - University Hospitals Bristol 

Panel members 

  • Professor John Chester - Alder Hey Children’s Hospital 

  • Dr Graham Collins - University of Oxford 

  • Dr Vicky Coyle - Queen's University Belfast 

  • Professor Richard Emsley – King's College London 

  • Andrea Harkin - University of Glasgow 

  • Professor Ann Henry - University of Leeds 

  • Professor Richard Wilson - University of Glasgow 

Patient and public involvement representatives

Our patient and public involvement representatives support the committee and associated panels as full voting members. 

  • Debbie Keatley 

  • Maisie McKenzie 

  • Sonia Patton 

  • Janette Rawlinson 

  • Richard Stephens 

  • Julie Wolfarth 

Clinical Expert Review Panel

The Clinical Expert Review Panel is chaired by members of the CRC. The membership of the Clinical Expert Review Panel is predominantly ad-hoc with the addition of standing panel members. 

Panel chair

Dr Bristi Basu – University of Cambridge 

Panel members

  • Dr Kim Linton - University of Manchester 

  • Professor Anthony Moorman - Newcastle University 

  • Professor Manuel Salto-Tellez - Queen's University Belfast

You might also be interested in

Eleven people sat around a rectangular desk at panel meeting.

Observer scheme

Early- to mid-career researchers can apply for the opportunity to observe our panel and committee meetings across our funding remit.

Three researchers looking at a file.

Meet our recent awardees

Each year we fund a wide range of new research through our response-mode funding schemes. Find out who has been recently funded and learn more about their research projects. 

A team of doctors reviewing a patient's medical file.

Our work in clinical research

We support a diverse pipeline of clinical and translation research and the clinical scientists committed to finding better ways to prevent, detect and treat cancer.